Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bernie Sanders results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 837 hits . Analysis detected 6,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,906 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,210 of 6,628 authors). This Bernie Sanders is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Bernie Sanders
Author details
Total words: 3,906
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.1% 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.4% 21.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst