Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Johnson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 1,192 hits . Analysis detected 8,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,652 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,153 of 6,628 authors). This Jake Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Jake Johnson
Author details
Total words: 4,652
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.0% 23.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst