Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Queally results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 2,216 hits . Analysis detected 18,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,204 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,803 of 6,628 authors). This Jon Queally is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Jon Queally
Author details
Total words: 11,204
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.6% 12.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.9% 13.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.8% 19.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst