Topic summary
40% 15 analyzed articles/videos 11,479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Immigration Policy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 7,946 hits . Analysis detected 76,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 85,207 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,684 of 15,690 topics). This Us Immigration Policy is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Us Immigration Policy
Topic details
Total words: 85,207
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score15 analyzed articles85.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst