Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 12,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us And Israeli Attack On Iran results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 4,775 hits . Analysis detected 33,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,008 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (15,072 of 16,562 topics). This Us And Israeli Attack On Iran is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Us And Israeli Attack On Iran
Topic details
Total words: 41,008
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles41K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst