Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynsey Chutel results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,012 of 6,628 authors). This Lynsey Chutel is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Lynsey Chutel
Author details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst