BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.8% saturation with 417 hits. Analysis detected 1,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 790 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.1% and a BS Rank of 50% (11,024 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

President Trump on Thursday assailed Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and two other leading conservative podcasters who oppose the war in Iran in a blistering 482-word Truth Social post that insulted his critics in starkly personal terms. 
The president reserved some of his sharpest attacks for Candace Owens and Alex Jones, two conspiracy-minded conservatives who in recent days have called for Mr. 
Trump to be removed from office. 
The president had faced weeks of criticism from all four media figures, but had largely ignored them until Thursday. 
“They have one thing in common, Low IQs,” the president said of the four media figures. 
“They’re stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too!” 
Mr. 
Trump set off a fresh round of criticism from the group with a profane post on Easter Sunday in which he declared that Iran would be “living in Hell” if it did not move to open the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping route that has been shut down during the war. 
Mr. 
Carlson, who appeared particularly bothered by the Easter statement, described Mr. 
Trump’s threats to Iran as “evil” and called on members of the Trump administration to stand up to him. 
“Now is time to say no, absolutely not, and say it directly to the president: No,” Mr. 
Carlson said on his podcast. 
On Tuesday, after Mr. 
Trump threatened to wipe out the Iranian civilization, Mr. 
Jones posted that Mr. 
Trump sounded “like an unhinged super villain from a Marvel comic movie.” 
Ms. 
Kelly asked: “Can’t he just behave like a normal human?” 
In his post on Thursday, Mr. 
Trump described Mr. 
Carlson as a “broken man,” saying he has “never been the same” since his dismissal from Fox News in 2023. 
He revived a long-running feud with Ms. 
Kelly over a question she asked during a debate in 2015 regarding statements he had made about women, writing that she had treated him “nastily.” 
He commented on Ms. 
Owens’s appearance, writing that Brigitte Macron, France’s first lady, was a “far more beautiful woman.” 
(Ms. 
Owens repeatedly accused Ms. 
Macron of being a man, prompting a lawsuit from her and her husband, President Emmanuel Macron.) 
And he wrote that Mr. 
Jones “says some of the dumbest things,” giving the example of his “horrendous” false claims about the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. 
“These so-called ‘pundits’ are LOSERS, and they always will be!” 
Mr. 
Trump wrote. 
All four podcasters attract significant audiences, with some episodes exceeding one million viewers. 
Mr. 
Carlson and Ms. 
Kelly, a former Fox News host, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 
Separately on Thursday, Mr. 
Trump criticized the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal after it accused him of a “premature” declaration of victory in Iran. 
The Journal has “one of the worst and most inaccurate ‘Editorial Boards’ in the World,” the president wrote. 
Mr. 
Trump insisted that he did not care about the views of the podcasters  writing that “nobody’s talking about them”  and said that his handling of the war was broadly supported by his voters. 
(Eighty-six percent of Republican voters said they supported the war in a Quinnipiac poll published late last month.) 
“As President, I could get them on my side anytime I want to,” Mr. 
Trump wrote of the podcasters, “but when they call, I don’t return their calls because I’m too busy on World and Country Affairs.” 
In his post, Mr. 
Trump complained that news outlets were paying too much attention to the comments by Mr. 
Jones and Ms. 
Owens, giving them “‘positive’ press for the first time in their lives.” 
Ms. 
Owens responded in an 11-word statement: “It may be time to put Grandpa up in a home.” 
In a video on social media, Mr. 
Jones said he “supported the old Trump that got so many good things done.” 
“But at the end of the day, I just feel sorry for him,” Mr. 
Jones said, describing the war in Iran as a “total disaster.” 
The president also criticized Marjorie Taylor Greene, the former Georgia congresswoman who was once one of his most vocal supporters but turned on him over foreign policy and his handling of files related to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 
Mr. 
Trump said Ms. 
Greene was “nasty,” describing her as “Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Brown.” 
Ms. 
Greene said on social media that Mr. 
Trump had “gone mad as he wages war against Iran.” 
“I fought alongside Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones to help get Trump elected,” she wrote. 
“And now he goes off on a rambling rant attacking all of us in one post. 
We NEVER changed, Trump did.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Tim Balk: 3.9%The New York Times: 1.7%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Tim Balk: 1.2%The New York Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 2.3%Tim Balk: 0.6%The New York Times: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.4%The New York Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Tim Balk: 2.9%The New York Times: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 1.3%Tim Balk: 0.3%The New York Times: 5.8%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Tim Balk: 0.4%The New York Times: 3.5%Pessimism Bias1.8%This article: 52.8%Tim Balk: 22.2%The New York Times: 9.4%Negativity Bias52.8%This article: 13.5%Tim Balk: 8.3%The New York Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias13.5%This article: 6.6%Tim Balk: 3.4%The New York Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Tim Balk: 1.4%The New York Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 2.1%The New York Times: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Tim Balk: 0.5%The New York Times: 0.9%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.5%The New York Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Tim Balk: 2.1%The New York Times: 1.1%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 0.9%Tim Balk: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Tim Balk: 24.7%The New York Times: 0.8%Ad Hominem20.6%This article: 2.0%Tim Balk: 0.5%The New York Times: 0.1%Straw Man2.0%This article: 9.1%Tim Balk: 2.7%The New York Times: 4.0%Appeal to Authority9.1%This article: 2.8%Tim Balk: 0.7%The New York Times: 1.2%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Tim Balk: 5.2%The New York Times: 2.7%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.6%Tim Balk: 2.0%The New York Times: 0.2%Bandwagon1.6%This article: 18.0%Tim Balk: 8.7%The New York Times: 3.4%Appeal to Emotion18.0%This article: 1.8%Tim Balk: 0.4%The New York Times: 0.4%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.6%The New York Times: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 3.2%Tim Balk: 1.1%The New York Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque3.2%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Tim Balk: 1.2%The New York Times: 1.0%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.3%Tim Balk: 0.3%The New York Times: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.7%The New York Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.8%Tim Balk: 1.2%The New York Times: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 18.7%Tim Balk: 5.5%The New York Times: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice18.7%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Tim Balk: 1.3%The New York Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Balk: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

790 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers51%attributed speech387writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCarlson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCarlson • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCarlson • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJones • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJones • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKelly • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageOwens • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJones • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJones • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJones • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 3 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageGreene • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGreene • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGreene • 19 words • 0.0% coverageGreene • 16 words • 0.0% coverageGreene • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Owens

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words4.2% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.8 ptsWriter: 31.8%Owens: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -10.3 ptsWriter: 10.3%Owens: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.