Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Right Wing Extremism And Alt Right results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 782 hits. Analysis detected 3,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,053 of 16,562 topics). This Right Wing Extremism And Alt Right is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Right Wing Extremism And Alt Right
Topic details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 24.8%24.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos