Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greene Marjorie Taylor results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 782 hits . Analysis detected 3,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,834 of 37,536 keywords). This Greene Marjorie Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Greene Marjorie Taylor
Keyword details
Total words: 3,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 24.8% 24.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst