Topic summary
24% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Issues results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,128 hits . Analysis detected 12,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,055 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,449 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Issues is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Urban Issues
Topic details
Total words: 16,055
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst