Topic summary
73% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,446 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Nations results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 2,919 hits . Analysis detected 24,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,571 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,003 of 15,967 topics). This United Nations is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. United Nations
Topic details
Total words: 20,571
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst