Topic summary
⁠40%6 analyzed articles/videos7,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unionization results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 3,325 hits. Analysis detected 26,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,548 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,527 of 16,243 topics). This Unionization is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Unionization

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.1%12.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos