Author summary
10%5 analyzed articles/videos2,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Thompson results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 882 hits. Analysis detected 8,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,015 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,914 of 6,316 authors). This Erica Thompson is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Erica Thompson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
7%Erica Thompson (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,015
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751006.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate