Topic summary
42% 18 analyzed articles/videos 10,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uk Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 8,808 hits . Analysis detected 68,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,662 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,445 of 15,769 topics). This Uk Politics is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Uk Politics
Topic details
Total words: 65,662
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score18 analyzed articles65.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst