Author summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Isaac results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 4,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,396 of 6,628 authors). This Anna Isaac is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Anna Isaac
Author details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 15.1% 15.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.8%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Special Pleading: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst