Topic summary
25% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Military results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 2,383 hits . Analysis detected 18,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,334 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (14,916 of 15,689 topics). This U S Military is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. U S Military
Topic details
Total words: 30,334
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles30.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst