Author summary
0% 22 analyzed articles/videos 2,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriel Dominguez results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 4,248 hits . Analysis detected 20,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,683 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,380 of 6,137 authors). This Gabriel Dominguez is worse (more manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Gabriel Dominguez
Author details
Total words: 11,683
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.5% percentile 4.3% BS Score20 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.6% 23.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 36.4% 36.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.3% 14.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 36.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst