DOJ charges U.S. Special Forces soldier for insider trading after $400K win on Maduro raid 30%

By Lillian Mann0%

4/23/2026, 1:39:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 223 faulty-reasoning hits from 654 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,441 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the article peer group.

Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, are seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad as they are escorted to an armored car en route to a federal courthouse in Manhattan on Monday. 
(Photo via: DEA) 
OAN Staff Lillian Mann 
7:20 PM  Thursday, April 23, 2026 
Federal authorities have arrested and charged a U.S. 
Army Special Forces soldier for purportedly profiting from insider information regarding the December raid that captured Venezuelan socialist dictator Nicolás Maduro. 
According to the unsealed indictment, Gannon Ken Van Dyke used the prediction market platform Polymarket to wager approximately $33,034 on the success of the operation. 
These bets were placed just days before President Donald Trump officially announced the capture. 
Van Dyke’s suspiciously well-timed gamble reportedly netted him more than $409,000 in profits. 
“In total, Van Dyke made approximately 13 bets from Dec. 27, 2025, through the evening of Jan. 26,” the Justice Department said. 
“Following his successful trading relating to Maduro- and Venezuela-related contracts, Van Dyke allegedly sent most of his proceeds to a foreign cryptocurrency vault before depositing them into a newly created online brokerage account,” the Justice Department said. 
After placing the bets, Van Dyke then allegedly tried to hide the evidence of the trades by attempting to delete his Polymarket account and change the email address registered to his cryptocurrency exchange account, the indictment noted. 
“The same day of the operation, Van Dyke withdrew the majority of his allegedly unlawful proceeds from his Polymarket account,” the DOJ added, reporting that three days after the Maudro raid Van Dyke had “asked Polymarket to delete his Polymarket account, falsely claiming that he had lost access to the email address.” 
Van Dyke was criminally charged with “unlawful use of confidential government information for personal gain, theft of nonpublic government information, commodities fraud, wire fraud, and making an unlawful monetary transaction,” according to the indictment. 
“The charges arise from an alleged scheme in which Van Dyke used sensitive classified information to make wagers on Polymarket,” a statement from the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York said. 
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates Polymarket, said it is also charging Van Dyke with civil charges. 
The agency added that it “seeks restitution, disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, trading and registration bans, and a permanent injunction against further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.” 
“Insider trading has no place on Polymarket,” the company added in a post on X. 
“Today’s arrest is proof the system works.” 
Last month, we published our enhanced market integrity rules to combat insider trading. 
When we identified a user trading on classified government information, we referred the matter to the DOJ & cooperated with their investigation. 
Insider trading has no place on Polymarket. 
 
 Polymarket (@Polymarket) April 23, 2026 
“The whole world, unfortunately, has become somewhat of a casino,” Trump said when asked more generally about betting markets and bets placed on major global events. 
“I’m not happy with any of that stuff,” he added. 
In a Thursday statement acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated, “Our men and women in uniform are trusted with classified information in order to accomplish their mission as safely and effectively as possible, and are prohibited from using this highly sensitive information for personal financial gain.” 
FBI Director Kash Patel also commented on the issue, saying that the indictment “makes clear no one is above the law, and this FBI will do whatever it takes to defend the homeland and safeguard our nation’s secrets.” 
The events Van Dyke’s arrest followed just a day after prediction market Kalshi’s probe discovered three political candidates who were caught betting on their own 2026 primary races. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
What do YOU think? 
Click here to jump to the comments! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 8.6%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 5.4%Lillian Mann: 8.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Lillian Mann: 2.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 3.3%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.1%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization1.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 6.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Lillian Mann: 2.5%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.0%Lillian Mann: 5.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice2.0%This article: 3.5%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.0%This article: 2.0%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.0%

654 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers58%attributed speech277writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJustice Department • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Department • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDOJ • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York • 34 words • 0.0% coverageCommodity Futures Trading Commission • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCommodity Futures Trading Commission • 30 words • 0.0% coveragePolymarket • 15 words • 0.0% coveragePolymarket • 7 words • 0.0% coveragePolymarket • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePolymarket • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePolymarket • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 46 words • 0.0% coverageKash Patel • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kash Patel

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words10% of attributed speech49% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Politically Right Leaning -11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.3 ptsWriter: 8.3%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Kash Patel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.