Keyword summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Forces results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 579 hits . Analysis detected 4,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,914 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,681 of 37,536 keywords). This Special Forces is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Special Forces
Keyword details
Total words: 5,914
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst