Author summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosie Shead results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ad Hominem, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 1,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (586 of 6,420 authors). This Rosie Shead is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Rosie Shead
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠91%Rosie Shead (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,232
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 28.1%28.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 15.5%15.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 16.1%16.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 10.9%10.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.6%17.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Author 28.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 16.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 15.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 10.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos