Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travel Disruptions results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 3,581 hits. Analysis detected 11,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,551 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,745 of 16,562 topics). This Travel Disruptions is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Travel Disruptions

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.9%33.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate