Topic summary
67% 23 analyzed articles/videos 19,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 7,355 hits . Analysis detected 60,962 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,739 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,853 of 15,753 topics). This Trade is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Trade
Topic details
Total words: 80,739
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score23 analyzed articles80.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst