Topic summary
81% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suicide results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 1,937 hits . Analysis detected 10,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,135 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,482 of 16,562 topics). This Suicide is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Suicide
Topic details
Total words: 9,135
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst