Topic summary
24%11 analyzed articles/videos6,798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spain results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 2,291 hits. Analysis detected 25,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,226 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,969 of 16,560 topics). This Spain is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate