Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Robinson results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 3,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,407 of 6,382 authors). This Matthew Robinson is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Matthew Robinson
Author details
Total words: 4,072
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst