Topic summary
81%7 analyzed articles/videos3,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Industry results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 3,269 hits. Analysis detected 21,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,812 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,121 of 16,558 topics). This Space Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Space Industry

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.4%19.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate