Topic summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos4,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southern California results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 2,433 hits. Analysis detected 20,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,015 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,452 of 15,267 topics). This Southern California is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate