Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Weber results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,035 hits . Analysis detected 8,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,962 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,899 of 6,547 authors). This Christopher Weber is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Christopher Weber
Author details
Total words: 9,962
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst