BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 510 faulty-reasoning hits from 512 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 23.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (19,792 of 21,188 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the article peer group.

Northern California experienced its strongest earthquake since 1940 on Wednesday morning when a 5.6-magnitude tremor struck Mendocino County, causing widespread shaking but no immediate reports of major damage or injuries. 
The earthquake hit about 7 miles (12 kilometers) northwest of Willits, an agricultural town, at 8:10 a.m. 
PT, according to the U.S. 
Geological Survey. 
The quake was centered inland, roughly 50 miles (80 kilometers) east of Fort Bragg and occurred at a depth of about 5 miles (8 kilometers). 
Residents across the region, including coastal communities, reported feeling the shaking. 
The quake struck an area of Mendocino County known for small farming communities about 140 miles (225 kilometers) northeast of San Francisco. 
While earthquakes are common in California, experts said this event was unusual because it occurred away from a major fault line and was the strongest in the area in nearly nine decades. 
Veteran California seismologist Lucy Jones said the region does experience earthquakes but they are typically smaller. 
She warned that aftershocks were likely, though they would “probably stay on the low side.” 
Three smaller earthquakes, all below magnitude 2.7, were recorded near the epicenter within an hour of the main quake. 
At Club Calpella Restaurant, about 10 miles (16 kilometers) south of the epicenter in Calpella, workers were caught off guard by the sudden shaking. 
Brie Leon said she had just turned on the restaurant’s open sign when the quake hit. 
“It almost felt like something hit the building,” Leon said. 
The shaking sent plates and liquor bottles rattling, knocked frames off walls, and sent bottles falling from shelves in the restaurant and storage areas. 
Despite the mess, Leon and her coworkers quickly began cleaning up before breakfast customers arrived. 
“It wasn’t a big, big quake, but things went everywhere,” she said. 
In Kelseyville, Alan Harris was at home with his family when his cellphone delivered an earthquake alert. 
Seconds later, the house began shaking violently. 
“I yelled downstairs immediately to my wife and daughter to make sure they were hanging on,” Harris said. 
“It was scary.” 
Security camera footage from inside his home captured the sounds of items shaking and crashing as they fell. 
The quake lasted about 30 seconds, knocking framed photos loose and toppling a computer monitor. 
Harris said no structural damage was found, but after living in the area for 10 years, he described it as “by leaps and bounds above everything else, the biggest we’ve felt here.” 
The residents farther west also felt the quake. 
Andrea Medina, who was working at Cafe One in Fort Bragg, described the shaking as noticeable but “not too strong.” 
Fawnell Dale, a dispatch supervisor with the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office in Ukiah, said officials had received no reports of injuries or damage. 
The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) said nearly 657,000 earthquake early warning alerts were sent across Northern California through the MyShake App. 
Officials said they had not received any reports of damage or injuries but were working with local authorities to monitor the situation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.6%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Olga R. Rodriguez: 3.2%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic12.9%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.1%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Olga R. Rodriguez: 2.2%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Olga R. Rodriguez: 4.1%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.8%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Olga R. Rodriguez: 2.5%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 5.9%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.9%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.3%Olga R. Rodriguez: 3.6%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.2%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 22.9%Olga R. Rodriguez: 5.7%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal22.9%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.5%Olga R. Rodriguez: 1.4%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.5%This article: 1.8%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.4%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Olga R. Rodriguez: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

512 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers37%attributed speech322writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageLucy Jones • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLucy Jones • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBrie Leon • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBrie Leon • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBrie Leon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Harris • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAlan Harris • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Harris • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Medina • 20 words • 0.0% coverageFawnell Dale • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alan Harris

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words28% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+34.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alan Harris: 34.0%34.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Alan Harris: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.