Topic summary
77% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,063 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Energy results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,995 hits . Analysis detected 17,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,180 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,612 of 15,447 topics). This Solar Energy is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Solar Energy
Topic details
Total words: 19,180
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst