Author summary
38%1 analyzed article/video703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Javier Carbajal results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,436 of 6,359 authors). This Javier Carbajal is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Javier Carbajal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Javier Carbajal (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,812
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos