Author summary
68%4 analyzed articles/videos1,261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Fernholz results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 879 hits. Analysis detected 7,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,353 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,173 of 6,252 authors). This Tim Fernholz is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Tim Fernholz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
34%Tim Fernholz (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,353
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.6%7.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate