Engadget42%

The First UL 3700-Compliant Plug-In Solar Microinverter Is Now Available In The US 76%

By Anna Washenko55%

7/20/2026, 9:55:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 862 faulty-reasoning hits from 229 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68% and a BS Rank of 76% (5,262 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the article peer group.

Last week, Hoymiles released its HiFlow Pro microinverter, which allows for use of solar power drawn through a typical household outlet. 
A few states have passed laws permitting this plug-in solar technology, and several others have proposed measures to allow it. 
As Electrek reports, while microinverters are not a new product category, this one from Hoymiles is notable for being the first in the US to conform to the recently enacted national safety standards. 
Adopted in December 2025, UL 3700 is the inaugural North American safety standard for plug-in photovoltaic energy systems, sometimes referred to as "balcony solar." 
One of the major issues toward adopting these small-scale solar panels is the risk that, since the converters draw electricity into a socket rather than out of it, power would be drawn into the grid during outages. 
This would endanger any crews working to restore service, so UL 3700 standardizes the features for preventing any accidental overloads among other safety concerns. 
Plug-in solar isn't really capable of powering a whole apartment, but it is a way of reducing reliance on the existing electric grid without needing a whole fleet of photovoltaic panels. 
Having a federal standard for these smaller setups expands the potential consumer base for solar to renters and apartment dwellers who couldn't pursue full rooftop installations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.8%Anna Washenko: 4.3%Engadget: 3.1%Confirmation Bias25.8%This article: 10.5%Anna Washenko: 1.1%Engadget: 1.4%Anchoring Bias10.5%This article: 8.7%Anna Washenko: 4.0%Engadget: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.0%Engadget: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.4%Engadget: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.7%Engadget: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Anna Washenko: 6.4%Engadget: 6.0%Framing Effect13.5%This article: 10.5%Anna Washenko: 1.2%Engadget: 1.0%Loss Aversion10.5%This article: 13.5%Anna Washenko: 0.9%Engadget: 0.8%Status Quo Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.5%Anna Washenko: 5.7%Engadget: 4.6%Optimism Bias20.5%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.7%Engadget: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.6%Anna Washenko: 9.3%Engadget: 7.0%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.0%Engadget: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.1%Engadget: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 20.1%Anna Washenko: 4.0%Engadget: 1.9%Halo Effect20.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.8%Engadget: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Anna Washenko: 3.2%Engadget: 1.8%Recency Bias9.2%This article: 20.1%Anna Washenko: 1.2%Engadget: 0.4%Primacy Effect20.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.3%Engadget: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.4%Engadget: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.6%Anna Washenko: 4.3%Engadget: 4.9%Appeal to Authority30.6%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.2%Engadget: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 2.7%Engadget: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.1%Anna Washenko: 9.4%Engadget: 5.3%Hasty Generalization20.1%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.1%Engadget: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 8.7%Anna Washenko: 1.1%Engadget: 0.9%Bandwagon8.7%This article: 10.5%Anna Washenko: 4.2%Engadget: 3.2%Appeal to Emotion10.5%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.3%Engadget: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 21.8%Anna Washenko: 4.4%Engadget: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.8%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.6%Engadget: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.7%Engadget: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 4.4%Engadget: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 26.6%Anna Washenko: 3.2%Engadget: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)26.6%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.5%Anna Washenko: 0.5%Engadget: 0.2%Middle Ground13.5%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 5.0%Engadget: 2.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 1.8%Engadget: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.4%Anna Washenko: 11.4%Engadget: 7.5%Biased Writer Voice14.4%This article: 11.4%Anna Washenko: 1.6%Engadget: 1.0%Indoctrination11.4%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Anna Washenko: 0.0%Engadget: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 39.7%Anna Washenko: 2.9%Engadget: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…39.7%

229 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers45%attributed speech127writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageHoymiles • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageElectrek • 33 words • 100.0% coverageUL 3700 • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageUL 3700 • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Electrek

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words32% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Electrek: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -55.1 ptsWriter: 55.1%Electrek: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-20.5 ptsWriter: 20.5%Electrek: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.