Speaker summary
76% 5 analyzed articles/videos 129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electrek results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Nature , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.7% saturation with 68 hits . Analysis detected 341 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 47% (15,073 of 28,364 speakers). This Electrek is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Electrek
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 29.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos129 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 52.7% 52.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 52.7% 52.7% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 52.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst