Author summary
67% 3 analyzed articles/videos 837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan M. Gitlin results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 714 hits . Analysis detected 6,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,755 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,880 of 6,244 authors). This Jonathan M. Gitlin is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Jonathan M. Gitlin
Author details
Total words: 4,755
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst