Keyword summary
44% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Power results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 2,701 hits . Analysis detected 23,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,197 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,930 of 34,858 keywords). This Solar Power is better (less manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Solar Power
Keyword details
Total words: 34,197
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles34.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst