Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Wertz results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 4,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,712 of 6,348 authors). This Joe Wertz is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Joe Wertz
Author details
Total words: 3,332
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst