Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety Standards results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 687 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,859 of 16,562 topics). This Safety Standards is worse (more manipulative) than 88.80% of the peer group.
Safety Standards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 687
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.8% percentile
8.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles687 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.8%19.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.9%8.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.6%10.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos