Topic summary
78% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Security Reform results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,777 hits . Analysis detected 11,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,874 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (10,004 of 16,562 topics). This Social Security Reform is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Social Security Reform
Topic details
Total words: 11,874
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst