Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Brett Rowland results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,323 hits . Analysis detected 8,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,205 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,274 authors). This Brett Rowland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Brett Rowland
Author details
Total words: 8,205
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.1% 16.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst