Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Brett Rowland results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,323 hits. Analysis detected 8,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,205 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,274 authors). This Brett Rowland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brett Rowland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Brett Rowland (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 8,205
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.1%16.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.0%11.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate