Publication summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,598 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Center Square results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,388 hits . Analysis detected 8,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,385 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 54% (190 of 410 publications). This The Center Square is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 10,385
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst