Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Bennett results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion , Appeal to Emotion , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 1,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,293 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Bennett is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michael Bennett
Author details
Total words: 1,293
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 9.3% 9.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst