Topic summary
54% 12 analyzed articles/videos 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Security results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 2,195 hits . Analysis detected 17,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,621 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,312 of 16,562 topics). This Social Security is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Social Security
Topic details
Total words: 19,621
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst