Publication summary
47%3 analyzed articles/videos272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 105.9 The X results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 3,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,221 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (58 of 386 publications). This 105.9 The X is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
105.9 The X
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
86%105.9 The X (selected)4%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 3,221
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 9.8%9.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Publication 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 4.1%4.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Publication 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate