Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Eric Boehm results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,224 hits . Analysis detected 6,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,812 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,358 authors). This Eric Boehm is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Eric Boehm
Author details
Total words: 5,812
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.1% 21.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst