Topic summary
64% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Policy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,761 hits . Analysis detected 18,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,753 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,794 of 15,845 topics). This Social Policy is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Social Policy
Topic details
Total words: 16,753
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst