Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,084 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Dixon results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 556 hits . Analysis detected 4,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,583 of 6,246 authors). This James Dixon is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. James Dixon
Author details
Total words: 4,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Slippery Slope: Author 12.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst