Topic summary
⁠41%5 analyzed articles/videos2,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samsung results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 734 hits. Analysis detected 8,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,716 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,095 of 16,562 topics). This Samsung is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Samsung
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos