Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian de Looper results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 2,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,419 of 6,628 authors). This Christian de Looper is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Christian de Looper
Author details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst