ZDNET58%

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro vs. Apple AirPods Pro 3: I listened to both models, and this pair wins 22%

By Christian de Looper0%

2/1/2026, 5:54:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 1,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,071 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,083 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the article peer group.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google. 
The first-party advantage is real. 
The most obvious example of why first-party products are worth considering is the AirPods lineup, led by the latest AirPods Pro 3. 
These headphones offer way more features when connected to an Apple device than when connected to other devices. 
But Apple isn't the only one to take advantage of its multi-device ecosystem. 
Samsung does it too, with its Galaxy Buds 3 Pro earbuds heading its audio lineup. 
Also: The top 10 headphones readers bought last year (don't include Beats, Sony, or Bose) 
But has one company done a better job building out its feature set? 
Are one pair of earbuds actually better than the other, or does it just depend on the ecosystem of devices you choose to use? 
I've used both the AirPods Pro 3 and the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro pretty extensively, and here's my take. 
Specifications 
Apple AirPods Pro 3 
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro 
Battery life 
8 hours (up to 24 hours with charging case) 
6 hours (up to 20 hours with charging case) 
Audio modes 
ANC, Transparency Mode, Adaptive Audio 
ANC, Ambient Sound, Adaptive 
IP rating 
IP57 (earbuds only) 
IP57 (earbuds only) 
Bluetooth version 
Bluetooth 5.3 
Bluetooth 5.4 
Additional features 
Hearing aid mode, live translation, Automatic Switching, Spatial Audio, heart rate monitor 
Hearing enhancements, Interpreter, Auto switch, 360 audio 
Price 
$249 
$250 
You should buy the AirPods Pro 3 if... 
1. 
You're currently an Apple user 
This one's obvious -- the AirPods Pro 3 work best with Apple products. 
Technically, you can pair the AirPods Pro 3 via Bluetooth to non-Apple devices, but you'll have a pretty limited experience and won't be able to use advanced features like spatial audio, Find My, and automatic wearing detection. 
Also: How to use Live Translation on your AirPods - not just the newest ones 
With Apple products, you can use automatic switching to seamlessly connect to an infinite number of compatible devices logged in to your iCloud account. 
You can also use spatial audio for a more immersive listening experience (I personally only really use it for movies and TV shows). 
And, you'll get access to the new Live Translation feature, which can translate speech in other languages in real-time when the AirPods in your ears are connected to an iPhone. 
2. 
You want fitness tracking features 
The AirPods Pro 3's standout feature is the inclusion of an in-ear heart rate monitor. 
This feature shifts the AirPods Pro from an audio-only device to a combination of an audio device and a health tracker. 
The heart rate monitor can be used for over 50 different workout types, which you can access straight through the Apple Fitness app. 
Also: AirPods Pro 3 fitness feature surprises triathlete tester - here's what he found 
The AirPods Pro 3 also work with the new Workout Buddy feature, which analyzes your fitness data using AI, then provides personalized motivation while you work out, in audio form, through your earbuds. 
That helps bridge the gap between health trackers and actual trainers. 
3. 
You want better battery life 
The Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro offer a solid battery life, promising six hours of continuous listening with ANC enabled, and a total of 20 hours with the charging case. 
The AirPods Pro 3, however, beat that. 
The earbuds offer eight hours of continuous listening, which makes them a better option for a long-haul flight or an extended day in the office. 
With the charging case, they'll get up to 24 hours, which again, is an improvement over the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. 
You should buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if... 
1. 
You don't use Apple devices 
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro earbuds don't just work well with Samsung devices -- they work well with Android devices in general. 
On an Android phone, you can download the Samsung Wear app to control the earbuds. 
From there, you can select noise modes, change the EQ, and more. 
There's no Samsung Wear app for iOS. 
Some features work best with Samsung phones, though. 
For starters, your Samsung phone should immediately recognize the earbuds and pair with them when you open the lid. 
Also: 7 reasons why I choose Android over iOS (and sideloading is not one of them) 
On top of that, there are some AI-focused features, like an Interpreter app that can translate speech in other languages, similar to the AirPods Pro 3's new Live Translation feature. 
Other features work similarly to those on Apple devices, including an Auto Switch feature for your Galaxy phones and wearables, a hearing enhancement feature, and more. 
To access the full suite of features for the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, you'll need a Samsung phone. 
But, unless you really care about those super-specific features, you'll have a good experience on any Android device. 
2. 
You want to customize your listening experience 
The most important consideration when buying earbuds is what phone you use. 
You're not going to buy AirPods if you have an Android phone or the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if you have an iPhone. 
However, other aspects of these earbuds can significantly impact how you use them. 
Notably, the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro offer more audio customization than the AirPods Pro 3. 
Also: Finally, a Samsung phone that I'd put my S25 Ultra away for (especially at this price) 
Apple, after all, thinks the AirPods already sound amazing -- why would you want to change how they sound? 
Most other earbud manufacturers take a more customizable approach, and with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, you'll get a nine-band EQ, with bands ranging from 63Hz to 16kHz. 
In addition to the custom EQ, there are several presets available for use if you prefer not to delve into the details of audio tuning yourself. 
3. 
You want deeper, harder-hitting bass 
The Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro aren't just more customizable for audio; they also deliver bigger, deeper bass. 
That doesn't mean they sound better, necessarily. 
In fact, the bass on the AirPods Pro 3 is more natural-sounding, which appeals more to me personally. 
But if you're a fan of big bass -- and there's certainly no shame in that -- then the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are the better earbuds for your needs. 
Alternatives to consider 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Christian de Looper: 1.9%ZDNET: 2.9%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 1.1%Christian de Looper: 0.6%ZDNET: 1.7%Anchoring Bias1.1%This article: 9.7%Christian de Looper: 3.8%ZDNET: 3.1%Availability Heuristic9.7%This article: 2.1%Christian de Looper: 0.5%ZDNET: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Christian de Looper: 3.3%ZDNET: 3.2%Overconfidence Bias9.2%This article: 5.9%Christian de Looper: 5.4%ZDNET: 4.2%Framing Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.1%Christian de Looper: 3.3%ZDNET: 5.2%Optimism Bias12.1%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Christian de Looper: 1.0%ZDNET: 4.5%Negativity Bias4.1%This article: 5.4%Christian de Looper: 1.8%ZDNET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.8%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias1.8%This article: 3.3%Christian de Looper: 1.6%ZDNET: 0.5%In-Group Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Christian de Looper: 4.8%ZDNET: 3.9%Halo Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.2%ZDNET: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 1.5%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 1.2%Christian de Looper: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 1.2%Christian de Looper: 0.3%ZDNET: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.2%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.9%Christian de Looper: 0.5%ZDNET: 4.7%Appeal to Authority1.9%This article: 4.5%Christian de Looper: 2.2%ZDNET: 1.5%False Dilemma4.5%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.6%Christian de Looper: 4.2%ZDNET: 6.5%Hasty Generalization14.6%This article: 7.2%Christian de Looper: 1.8%ZDNET: 0.5%Red Herring7.2%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.7%ZDNET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.9%Christian de Looper: 1.2%ZDNET: 2.0%Appeal to Emotion4.9%This article: 1.7%Christian de Looper: 0.5%ZDNET: 0.7%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 4.1%Christian de Looper: 1.0%ZDNET: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.1%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.8%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.2%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.0%Christian de Looper: 0.7%ZDNET: 0.3%Composition/Division3.0%This article: 4.3%Christian de Looper: 2.4%ZDNET: 4.9%Anecdotal4.3%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 30.4%Christian de Looper: 7.6%ZDNET: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)30.4%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Christian de Looper: 0.9%ZDNET: 0.2%Middle Ground3.6%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.9%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 1.4%Christian de Looper: 0.4%ZDNET: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.6%ZDNET: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.7%Christian de Looper: 1.3%ZDNET: 3.9%Indoctrination1.7%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christian de Looper: 0.0%ZDNET: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Christian de Looper: 1.4%ZDNET: 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

1071 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker0.9%attributed speech1,061writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageZDNET • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

ZDNET

100%flagged-word coverage
10 attributed words100% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +97.1 ptsWriter: 2.9%ZDNET: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%ZDNET: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%ZDNET: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%ZDNET: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.